Your results fit into seven levels which is The Universal Hierarchy of Motivation profile. Six of the Levels can be derived theoretically from three of the four fundamental 'Options' in life, as each can have a self focus (selfish) or focus on others (selfless)1:

1. Doing (or acting) for ourselves which we can call Survival — or doing for others which we can call Courage.
2. Feeling for ourselves which we can call Pleasure (or Passion) or feeling for others which is Compassion.
3. Thinking for ourselves which we can call Power (or Control) or thinking for others which is Wisdom.

The fourth 'Option' -Being- can be interpreted as a focus on both self and others, and therefore connection with all life. This idea is a bit esoteric at one level, but clearly the case scientifically and at the physical level. Our brain is made of exactly the same 'stuff' as the material around us and the atoms of our body are continuously interchanging with the environment, so much so that 'your body does not contain a single one of the molecules that it contained seven years ago2'. So Being, in terms of its connection to all life, may be considered to relate to Meaning.

Therefore we can theoretically come up with 7 Levels. This matches with the experience of several enduring philosophical traditions which have observed 7 distinct levels of energy or 'Chakras'. This then gives us the Seven Basic Human Motivations3 which are shown as Levels in the model — The Universal Hierarchy of Motivation

Your profile above has many implications. For example, those Levels which have only one circle marked possibly indicate that you are either not very familiar with this Level, or are not being driven significantly by the corresponding motivation. If a Level has no Rooms circled then this may indicate that you are stuck at this Level and this may present problems in your life. The arrows indicate the Room at each Level upon which you are likely to be most focused. If there is no Room with an arrow at a Level, and no Rooms circled, then you may not be aware of this Level in your daily life. Note that this report cannot be used to assess a person’s mental health in any way.

The detailed descriptions of these implications for you are covered in the Full Report in Sections 3 through 20.

The Report has most often proven highly perceptive and descriptive even when respondents have at first considered it to be otherwise. However, if parts of the Report do not seem accurate, the following may assist you in identifying why this may be the case. It is highly recommended before reviewing these, that you first show your report to a friend, relative, partner, colleague, or someone who knows you very well and who is also self-aware (that is they know them-self well), and ask them how accurate they think it is.

1. You may be moving through a transition stage in your life or period of personal growth: Look at Section 23 Where To From Here — for You? and consider possible action steps you may take from here.
2. You may be in an unusual or highly stressful situation, or have just been through one: Repeat this questionnaire in a few weeks, or when your current home or work situation changes.
3. You may not have understood the questions in the questionnaire or have a different definition for the words in the answers. Consider reading more about typologies generally (one example is Who am I by Robert Frager) or becoming accredited in one or more of the key underlying typologies to this model, either Temperament Theory, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator or the Enneagram.
4. Your level of self-awareness may need further development: Ask a friend, relative or someone who knows you very well and who is also self-aware (that is they know them-self well) to comment on your report and rate how accurate the sections are. It is suggested that they use the same 1-5 scale for making the accuracy rating as is in the Report on-line. Then you can review with them where there are differences and whether this helps you to understand how others see you.
5. You may have answered the questions in a way that identifies an incorrect preferred Mental Preferences possibly because of your current situation. Re-consider the Section 7 Your Mental Preferences and whether the profile seems correct to you. Then, either re-do the questionnaire or look at Section 23 Where To From Here — for You? and consider possible action steps you may take.
6. This questionnaire and related Report is not accurate for you: The Universal Hierarchy of Motivation is built by synergistically combining the understandings from a range of profound philosophies, cultures and minds as well as intense experiences. It integrates seven global typologies which have been shown to apply equally across race, culture and national boundaries, and it uses 'repetitive mapping' to ensure the validity of the results.
   1. Ask a friend, relative or someone who knows you very well and who is also self-aware (that is they know them-self well) to comment on your report and rate how accurate the sections are. It is suggested that they use the same 1-5 scale for making the accuracy rating as is in the Report on-line, and then review whether there are major differences between you and them. Also ask them for qualitative feedback on how well or otherwise the Report relates to you. It may be worth asking them to complete a Report so you can print off a dual Report and compare the areas in question.
   2. Check to see if the relative length of all the bars in Section 3 Your Motivational Preferences are equal, or three or more of the bars in Section 7 Your Mental Preferences and Section 14 Your Decision Making Aptitudes are of equal length. If this is the case then it may be that your Report is only partially valid, and your highest preference is not the one indicated. Identify which of the Mental Preferences at Section 7 Your Mental Preferences most applies and then redo the questionnaire by selecting whether it is Doing, Feeling, Thinking or Being which applies most to you. Then you can review your Report again.